Written by
David Koke
Head of Marketing

Beacon’s supply chain visibility and collaboration platform empowers organizations to achieve more efficient, reliable and sustainable supply chains.

In this article

Supply Chain Glossary
Market Insights
Published: 
December 13, 2024

Global Port Congestion: 68% of Major Ports See Anchor Times Increase in 2024

With the Red Sea crisis, port strikes, a series of extreme weather events and even a container explosion in Ningbo causing havoc for supply chain operators, port congestion was a hot topic in 2024.

Global interest in the topic spiked in June, reaching a level of interest not seen since the COVID-19 pandemic. 

Worldwide search activity for port congestion Dec 2019 - Dec 2024 (Source: Google Trends)

But just how bad of a year was it in terms of port congestion? 

Of 88 analyzed ports, 60 (68%) recorded longer average vessel anchor times in 2024 compared to 2023. The increases were, however, for the most part minor with 34 of these 60 ports recording increases of less than two hours. 30% of ports saw increases of more than 2 hours and a modest 15% recorded reductions in congestion of more than two hours. 

Distribution of ports by change in average anchor times (2024 vs. 2023)

 YoY change 

 Number of ports

 % of ports

 Increase 10 hours+

 5

 5.7%

 Increase 2-10 hours

 21

 23.9%

 Increase 0-2 hours

 34

 38.6%

 Decrease 0-2 hours

 15

 17.0%

 Decrease 2-10 hours

 11

 12.5%

 Decrease 10+ hours

 2

 2.3%

Which Ports Recorded the Biggest Changes in Port Congestion?

The most significant increases were observed in Durban (+1.26 days), Santos (+0.85), Charleston (+0.72), Vancouver (+0.68), and Manila (+0.65), with no other ports recording an increase exceeding 10 hours.

Ports with largest increases in average anchor times (2024 vs. 2023)

Port

Country

2024 Average (days)

2023 Average (days)

Change (days)

Change (%)

Durban

South Africa

2.93

1.67

1.26

75.33%

Santos

Brazil

1.43

0.58

0.85

146.42%

Charleston

United States

0.93

0.21

0.72

347.66%

Vancouver

Canada

1.37

0.69

0.68

98.87%

Manila

Philippines

1.64

0.99

0.65

66.41%

Among improved ports, Mersin (Turkey) led the way, reducing anchor times by more than two days. Gdansk (Poland) also reported a half day reduction, but no other port saw a decrease of more than 10 hours

Ports with largest decrease in average anchor times (2024 vs. 2023)

Port

Country

2024 Average (days)

2023 Average (days)

Change (days)

Change (%)

Mersin

Turkey

0.59

2.98

-2.39

-80.11%

Gdansk

Poland

0.13

0.60

-0.47

-79.08%

Ambarli

Turkey

0.00

0.40

-0.39

-98.76%

Quanzhou

China

0.10

0.38

-0.29

-74.35%

Rizhao

China

0.32

0.59

-0.27

-45.82%

Regional Port Congestion Trends

The effects of disruption were not uniformly felt across regions. While European, SE Asian an North American ports saw year-on-year increases ranging from 28-35%, East Asia and the Middle East saw improvement over 2023 levels.

Average anchor times by region (2024 vs. 2023)

Region

2024 Average (days)

2023 Average (days)

Change (days)

Change (%)

Europe

0.23

0.18

+0.05

+28%

North America

0.57

0.42

+0.15

+35%

East Asia

0.12

0.14

-0.02

+14%

SE Asia

0.35

0.27

+0.08

+30%

MENA

0.26

0.52

-0.26

-50%

North America

North American ports continue to rank among the world’s most congested. The average anchor time across ports in the region was 0.6 days (14 hours), an increase of approximately four hours compared to 2023. 

Of 11 analyzed North American ports, nine saw increases in average anchor times with Charleston (+0.7 days), Vancouver (+0.7) and Norfolk (+0.3) all seeing average wait times increase by more than 5 hours. Houston (-0.1 days) and Savannah (-0.3) were the only two major North America ports to record improved congestion levels in 2024. 

Europe

Average vessel waiting times across the 17 analyzed European ports was 0.23 days, less than half as long as North American ports. 

Of these ports, 13 saw increases, with Marsaxlokk (+0.4 days) and Valencia (+0.2) recording the largest increases. Rotterdam saw wait times nearly double, although the port remained below the regional average at 0.21 days. At Europe’s other mega hub in Antwerp, congestion levels increased by less than an hour. Le Havre (-0.1 days) and Gdansk (-0.5) were the only major European ports to record reductions in vessel waiting times of more than two hours. 

Asia

East Asia continues to showcase the class of its port infrastructure with average anchor times across the region falling to 0.12 days or less than 3 hours. This improvement was recorded despite average anchor times more than doubling in both Shanghai and Hong Kong. 

Southeast Asia saw average wait times increase 30% to 8.4 hours across 10 analyzed ports. This was largely influenced by the worsening conditions in Manila. Despite nearly doubling average anchor times in Singapore, the port ranked 52nd on our list of most congested ports in 2024. 

Congestion Changes by Port

Port Country 2023 Average (days) 2024 Average
(days)

Change
(days)

Change (hours) Change (%)
Durban South Africa 1.7 2.9 1.3 30.2 75%
Santos Brazil 0.6 1.4 0.8 20.3 146%
Charleston United States 0.2 0.9 0.7 17.3 348%
Vancouver Canada 0.7 1.4 0.7 16.3 99%
Manila Philippines 1.0 1.6 0.7 15.7 66%
Marsaxlokk Malta 0.1 0.5 0.4 9.4 340%
Chittagong Bangladesh 1.0 1.3 0.3 8.3 35%
Colón Panama 0.2 0.5 0.3 7.8 180%
Colombo Sri Lanka 0.3 0.6 0.3 7.4 107%
Balboa Panama 0.1 0.4 0.3 6.1 182%
Norfolk United States 0.4 0.7 0.3 6.1 57%
Lomé Togo 0.8 1.1 0.3 6.1 30%
Shanghai China 0.2 0.5 0.2 5.8 116%
Jebel Ali United Arab Emirates 0.5 0.7 0.2 5.3 46%
Valencia Spain 0.2 0.4 0.2 4.5 107%
Khalifa United Arab Emirates 0.3 0.5 0.2 4.4 58%
Tanjung Perak Indonesia 0.5 0.6 0.2 3.6 32%
Barcelona Spain 0.2 0.3 0.1 3.6 86%
Felixstowe United Kingdom 0.1 0.3 0.1 3.4 120%
Salalah Oman 0.2 0.3 0.1 3.2 83%
Oakland United States 0.2 0.4 0.1 3.1 54%
Piraeus Greece 0.4 0.6 0.1 3.0 29%
Genova Italy 0.0 0.2 0.1 2.8 237%
Hamburg Germany 0.1 0.2 0.1 2.6 103%
Rotterdam Netherlands 0.1 0.2 0.1 2.3 87%
Los Angeles United States 0.1 0.2 0.1 2.1 115%
Kingston Jamaica 0.4 0.5 0.1 1.8 19%
Hong Kong China 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.7 147%
Singapore Singapore 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.7 97%
New York/New Jersey United States 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.6 106%
Cartagena Colombia 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.4 307%
Port Kelang Malaysia 0.3 0.4 0.1 1.3 18%
Jawaharlal Nehru/Nhava Shiva India 0.1 0.2 0.0 1.1 34%
Yokohama Japan 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.1 164%
Tokyo Japan 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.1 127%
Callao Peru 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.0 28%
Sydney Australia 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.0 45%
Long Beach United States 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 399%
Guayaquil Ecuador 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.8 28%
San Antonio Chile 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.8 22%
Antwerp Belgium 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.7 14%
Tanjung Pelepas Malaysia 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.7 25%
St Petersburg Russia 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.7 14%
Ho Chi Minh City Vietnam 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.6 54%
Kobe Japan 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 134%
Southampton United Kingdom 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.5 14%
Seattle/Tacoma United States 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 72%
Bremen/Bremerhaven Germany 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.5 28%
Incheon South Korea 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.5 37%
Jeddah Saudi Arabia 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.4 11%
Mundra India 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.3 5%
Qingdao China 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 62%
Hai Phong Vietnam 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 11%
Algeciras Spain 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 29%
Yeosu Gwangyang South Korea 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 61%
Kaohsiung Taiwan 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 6%
Qinzhou China 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 3%
Nagoya Japan 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4%
Osaka Japan 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22%
Busan South Korea 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1%
Tanger Med France 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -5%
King Abdullah Saudi Arabia 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.1 -38%
Shekou China 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.1 -40%
Laem Chabang Thailand 0.1 0.1 0.0 -0.1 -9%
Taichung Taiwan 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.2 -22%
Taipei Taiwan 0.1 0.0 0.0 -0.3 -21%
Gioia Tauro Italy 0.2 0.2 0.0 -0.3 -7%
Liverpool United Kingdom 0.1 0.1 0.0 -0.4 -18%
Yantian China 0.1 0.1 0.0 -0.4 -11%
Fuzhou China 0.1 0.0 0.0 -0.8 -45%
Ningbo China 0.4 0.3 0.0 -0.9 -10%
Melbourne Australia 0.3 0.3 0.0 -1.1 -15%
Xiamen China 0.2 0.1 -0.1 -1.6 -37%
Jinzhou China 0.1 0.1 -0.1 -1.7 -50%
Cai Mep Vietnam 0.1 0.0 -0.1 -1.8 -64%
Tianjin China 0.2 0.2 -0.1 -2.0 -35%
Port Said Egypt 0.2 0.1 -0.1 -2.3 -51%
Houston United States 1.1 1.0 -0.1 -2.5 -10%
Le Havre France 0.3 0.2 -0.1 -2.6 -33%
Lianyungang China 0.3 0.2 -0.1 -2.8 -37%
Tanjung Priok Indonesia 0.4 0.3 -0.1 -3.2 -30%
Zhoushan China 0.4 0.2 -0.2 -3.8 -41%
Savannah United States 1.4 1.1 -0.3 -6.2 -19%
Rizhao China 0.6 0.3 -0.3 -6.5 -46%
Quanzhou China 0.4 0.1 -0.3 -6.8 -74%
Ambarli Turkey 0.4 0.0 -0.4 -9.4 -99%
Gdansk Poland 0.6 0.1 -0.5 -11.4 -79%
Mersin Turkey 3.0 0.6 -2.4 -57.3 -80%